The waves in the wavetable on the Ti

[Smag]

Am I right in thinking that if you sweep through a table of, say 10 waves, it would produce completely different sounds to sweeping through a table with the same waves but which are in a different order?

[DIGITAL SCREAMS]

Hehe damn u for asking this. It reminds me of some verbal reasoning test i took when i was 12. Awe.....im no good at this kinda reasoning hehe.

Im still trying to figure it out....

DS :lol:

[acid1]

i'd say yes...

infact i'd say the time at which you sweep would play a factor in the difference of the sound created

[Smag]

i'd say yes...

infact i'd say the time at which you sweep would play a factor in the difference of the sound created

:roll: Hmmm, Interesting. It sounds as though minor changes in the wavetable can produce big changes in the sound

[ben crosland]

Am I right in thinking that if you sweep through a table of, say 10 waves, it would produce completely different sounds to sweeping through a table with the same waves but which are in a different order?

Sure. When the Index parameter is set to a point in between two waves, the result is a blend between the two, with an exact 50/50 blend when the Index is exactly half-way between them. So, obviously the order in which the waves appear will affect the achievable timbres.

[Smag]

:idea: ......... Next week - Modular synthesis

[nordlead]

you can make yourself a wavetable patch on your C:

- osc1 to sine, choose a waveshape

- osc2 to sine, choose dif waveshape

- lfo1 to osc1 waveshape

- lfo2 to osc2 waveshape

- lfo3 to osc balance

- some more assigns

its quite rudimentary but its as close as my virusC will get of wavetables )-:

[blay]

its quite rudimentary but its as close as my virusC will get of wavetables )-:

there you go HC - no need to hassle access for any more updates :wink:

[Hollowcell]

its quite rudimentary but its as close as my virusC will get of wavetables )-:

there you go HC - no need to hassle access for any more updates :wink:

Hehehe, just doesn't quite cut the mustard. That's life though I guess. :D

[Tomer=Trance]

you can make yourself a wavetable patch on your C:

- osc1 to sine, choose a waveshape

- osc2 to sine, choose dif waveshape

- lfo1 to osc1 waveshape

- lfo2 to osc2 waveshape

- lfo3 to osc balance

- some more assigns

its quite rudimentary but its as close as my virusC will get of wavetables )-:

just a little something to add:
lfo 2 to filter 1 and 2 modulationg using sample and hold waveform which is synced to clock.
this creat an extremly wicked digital but warm sound.
add some phaser to creat a bit of movment.

[Timo]

How do wavetables work......

.... ie. how did Access source/record the waves and then integrate them into the wavetables?

I mean, if they recorded a single-cycle waveform, did they have to multisample it to avoid aliasing, etc?

..Or do they convert the waveform into a complex mathematical "vector" or "bezier" type waveform, so they can stretch it or contract it as necessary without loss of quality (similarly how true-type fonts work as opposed to the bitmap fonts of old, in a different application).

Also, do Access intend to provide the facility to edit and upload our own waves to the wavetables?

[nordlead]

Nice tricks there Tomer, thanks. I'll give it a try later.