PDA

View Full Version : Replace MC505 Groovebox with Drum Machine/Sampler/other?


TheHobbit
29.03.2010, 04:56 PM
Hi all need some advise and views (my minds a little scrambled and over fried at the moment with other work). Please bare in mind this is a reflective post to help decide and looking for input from you all please.
Basically my rig I have had an MC505 for many years which sounds are still accessible via midi but the screens gone a several controllers/buttons not functioning and more likely beyond or not able to get repaired. I want to replace it and realise there are many options, different work methods and products options to replace it, so here I am.
What I need is something to replace the groove box (experience), enable to create beats/loops/phrases outside of the PC environment but still be able to integrate it into the DAW (Cubase/Reaper). Already have a massive database of (Battery/Kontakt/VSTs/Samples/Instruments) which has got me thinking about the sampler route, more specific the Akais MPCs 2500/5000.
So this is the headache...electronica music no acoustics music and here’s what I am mulling over :
Sampling :
Akai 2500/5000
The 5000 is pretty much doubling up what I already have in a DAW, however, has ADAT which would be useful as my rig is running out of inputs outputs but I do have other routing (Fireface direct into DAW with send/returns for external effects and inputs from h/ware synths). As the RME Fireface800 has ADAT which can be daisy chained as it is firstly used by the TC fireworx) it would be handy however I am unsure if the ADAT would carry just one stereo signal from the AKAI to the Soundcard/DAW or multitrack 8 tracks at once and what is the maximum stereo channels the ADAT can carry ie 8+1=9 stereo signals? Does it integrate with a PC nicely for sequencing remotely (from DAW to Akai).The 2500 seems better for me as I don’t really need the 5000’s multitracking function but the ADAT is appealing for routing into the DAW...Or could I route external equipment into the DAW via Akai?
Groove boxes :
Elektrons SPS1-MKii (don’t think I would need the UW)
Elektrons Octatrack (when released – but gut feeling its more gimicky than production)
Korgs Electribe
There is a massive difference and comparison which I know is showing my hesitation for the 2.
Main points are :
I have a good rig in a static location with the synths and vst plugins.
I want to be able to create beats more fluidly and using pads and not reltying on a PC/mouse.
Portablility of a drummachine/sampler (I know the Akai 5000 is not that portable but more so than the rig)
I want to be able to integrate whatever I get in with the PC DAW with ease.
I looking for opinions of the S5000 being over the top considering the existing rig, will it integrate nicely and it does provide a 1 unit solution or should I look at the 2500/something else?
Should I simply replace with a drum machine?
Should I be less greedy or more specific and look at a dedicated drum machine/groovebox/sampler.

Thanks for your time

Logic Circuit
29.03.2010, 06:30 PM
Hi,

Sorry for the quick, short reply.

Have you thought of Native Instruments Maschine?

Cheers,

Dave.

TheHobbit
29.03.2010, 07:04 PM
Did consider the Machine but as i understand its not entirely standalon and requires the PC link? I might be wrong but thats my perecption....starting to lean towards the S1000 with the latest (final) jjo OS or the Electron Drum Machine mkII UW

Atziluth
29.03.2010, 08:23 PM
@ TheHobbit

Yes, I understand your problem here so some are limited and other gear are to massive...... now to find the right box :-)

There are now some new Electribes comming from KORG, still the same workflow but now with SD card drive and fresh sounds (hardware, and can be integrated in your DAW with MIDI). The drum machine/synth is the ELECTRIBE EMX and the sampler the ELECTRIBE ESX.

Then there are the ROLAND MC-909 or ROLAND MC-808. These are the next generation Gooveboxes of yours. They are at good prices now. The MC-909 has a bigger display and you can insert a SRX-card for additional sounds.

The AKAI S5000 is too big IMO for the rig you already have, but it's up to you. If you like AKAI then tend to a 2500 this would be enough.

And what about the SPECTRALIS from radical technologies? This is a all in one machine, too but more compact and a sort of best of ELECTRIBE and S5000. I would say have a look at this sampler/groovebox/drum machine.

I think the SPECTRALIS 2 would fit your need completely, the link:

http://www.radikaltechnologies.com/spectralis2_hybrid_synthesizer.html

Was it a help?

Cheers

The Outsider
29.03.2010, 09:20 PM
Why not a Yamaha RS7000? For me it is the TB 303 of sample station...
Great integration with Ableton External instrument.
Hundred of quality Fx.
New OS with advanced filter routing possibility.
And the price on occasion is more than correct with the possibilities of the machine.
The only thing which can miss is a modular matrix like the Virus.

TheHobbit
29.03.2010, 09:53 PM
Yhanks for advice think I am steering away from the 5000, more likely to be the MPC1000 or 2500. Other options new electribes from Korg sound interesting.

The machinedrum is still in my mind but the Octatrack has still got me interested as a groovebox.

I am looking into the Spectralis and maybe a contender at first glance bearing in mind I have a lot of soft synths, the prophet08, JD800 and of course virus ti.
The main thing is with the PC and existing well overflowing sample library including the MC505 hits etc...a groovebox sampler seems to be the best route rather than a dedicated dum machine - really got to think about how I am going to approach workflow, audio routing with existing capacity.

Keep the ideas flowing please.

TheHobbit
29.03.2010, 09:57 PM
I am loving the Spectralis 2 video demo...very chilled still reading ;)
Are there any European outlets or better still UK outlets?

Timo
30.03.2010, 12:45 AM
Was also about to mention the MC909, it's like the 505 but on steroids, as well as having sampling. - Think it has 16mb Flash RAM as standard, with up to 256mb additional normal volatile RAM [not Flash RAM] as an option. (Because any such >256mb RAM upgrade is not flash-ram, though, you have to save the samples held in the RAM elsewhere before powering down, via USB to computer or to a SmartMedia card on the 909 itself [however, the largest SmartMedia card is only 128mb though]).

The 909 also has beat slicing/chopping (like Propellerheads Recycle), time-stretching etc.

Unlike the MC505, the 909 has velocity sensitive pads.

http://soundonsound.com/sos/Mar03/articles/rolandmc909.asp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_MC-909

Would've been great if the MC909 had some of the newer features of the MC808 (such as 2GB Compact Flash for samples, etc.) and higher poly. However the MC808 itself lacks most performance controls (knobs, sliders, velocity pads, etc.) and other internal specifications compared to the 909, even though the sound engine is the same. Unlike the MC909, the 808 also requires the use of a PC to edit samples.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_MC-808

Choond
06.05.2010, 07:51 AM
I've owned my fair share of grooveboxes/beat machines over the years and I think my priorities have been narrowed down in much the same way yours have. Timing, reliability & integration are very important to me too.

I am using a nice old Yamaha A5000 sampler now (expanded with ADAT/sdif/6 balanced outs), but I'd welcome the chance to own an MPC at some point as well.

As far as grooveboxes go, I feel that NI Maschine has taken it all to a new level now, and then you have things like Spectrasonics RMX with its huge libraries. But these are not hardware solutions, and i can see the reason why you'd like to stick with hardware.

If it were me and I didn't have the Yamaha A5000, I'd probably just buy an AKAI MPC 4k and learn to use it very well.

Prime NL
06.05.2010, 10:26 AM
I would stick with a Akai MPC 1000/2500/3000 especially due to the tight timing they have and flexibility.

The Korg Electribes are great fun....but their i could never integrate their typical sound in my total setup.

TheHobbit
06.05.2010, 04:52 PM
Im still stuck between Maschine and an Akai MPC2500 or possibly MC5000.

The mashine is very good but not standalone and I need to play on one before I decide.

The Akai is excellent integrated or standalone but I am not clear on how well it integrates with Cubase5 and so.

I really need to demo the 2 :/

~BHG~
06.05.2010, 06:31 PM
Get an MPC 1000(More compact and pretty much does what the 2500 does)......and the JJ OS.

Personally I dont see why anyone would want to use the OS Akia gives you, (kinda a gimmick in my book) and I'm sure if JJ OS didn't exist MPCs wouldnt be so popular still.

Haven't spent much time with the 2500's JJ OS but I'm sure it just as good.

Been using my 1000 with my TI for about a year now and haven't got one crash(Cant count how many times gAbleton has crashed my work!)

TheHobbit
06.05.2010, 08:16 PM
Hi BHG

Ive seen the website re jjOS and not being a user of MPC's what is the advantages of jjos in your experience, main features and benefits please.

Choond
07.05.2010, 07:47 AM
Im still stuck between Maschine and an Akai MPC2500 or possibly MC5000.

The mashine is very good but not standalone and I need to play on one before I decide.

The Akai is excellent integrated or standalone but I am not clear on how well it integrates with Cubase5 and so.

I really need to demo the 2 :/

I feel for you; its kind of a tough choice and also a very subjective one. I must admit I'm kind of over pattern sequencers with sloppy timing. That's why very tight, solid instruments like classic samplers and the MPC series appeal to me. Maschine is a great piece of kit IMO, but I'm not convinced that its midi implementation and timing is rock solid yet. I mean, its software so there are a lot of variables that can destabilise it, whereas dedicated gear does not suffer in the same way.

~BHG~
07.05.2010, 06:44 PM
I pretty much agree with Choond, It's all about preference. Rock solid and reliable, and will sequence every knob motion on my TI without effort....MPC

I would only consider a Maschine when they build one with internal sound. Until then its an awesome piece of gear but kinda is useless since it's only reliable as your PC with load on it!

TheHobbit
07.05.2010, 09:31 PM
Thanks BHG think the MPC is going to be the way to go - more I think about it more I want an 'Independant' bit of kit that can also integrate with Cubase5.

The Mrs's isn't going to be happy lol.

x