well i do understand what your saying...but i think u r missing the point...i dont agree with what companies do either...and about the unique external gear or whatever u r talking about...it doesnt modify the sound completely either, it just enhances it...the reason being to make it more appealing then it is...well question i had was where do u draw the line...because anything else u would add would be just as much of a modification as reverb or delay...i just dont seem to understand how ppl will be so 2 sided on this...if some1 added compression, enhancer, eq, or any reverb/delay, other then this specific instance it would be wrong, and yet its ok with this one...just because it is a basic reverb used in cubase...is it because most of u have cubase...? im seriouse curious on this...so if some1 used compression and an enhancer on the nord sounds it would be going to far which would change the sound less then the reverb?
im mean to be honest he can do whatever he likes to do...i just was puttin my personal opinion which then turned into a discussion that if some1 put this it would be okay and if some1 put that it would be wrong...now im wondering why modifying the sound is good only in this specific instance yet its not in others...eitherway u r modifyin what the original outcome would be...what makes this such a special circumstance...vs demos that use compression or enhancer or eq?

peace
Blank

Perhaps I should give my Mp3 Demos another headline:

"This Mp3 shows what you CAN do with the soundsets, If you know what a Reverb effect is, and if you know what Tempo Synced Delay is"

Would this satisfy you blank :D

.i

Blank,

Have you got some demos of what your soundset will sound like?

I`d draw the line at reverb and delay, just as manuel has done. When you add compression/enhancement/eq your changing the structure of the patches sound. With delay/reverb on the most basic settings your adding copies of the original sound multiple times.

I can see where you are coming from aswell, I think its all down to personal tastes, probally why it makes a good discussion.

With the unique external gear comment, I was meaning if he passed the original sound through and the output was nothing like the original then that`d be misleading. An example could be using a vocoder.

Any hoo manuels programming skills dont need the use of powerfull effects to make them sound good. The ones I have are amazing.

:D

Dude do whatever the fuk u want to really...but if u r serious...maybe just a simple "all sounds were maybe with "{synth}" and "{FX}" was added"...

peace
Blank

Well Blank, any news on your soundset?

:idea:
This is exactly what I have done... If you take a closer look, you will see, I have always written, what additional FX had been used in the demos
8O


Anyway... the Q demo will follow soon.... I have not much time at the moment.... The V-Station set comes soon, too

oh really?.....you always had this? i never saw it...could have been my 1600X12000 desktop... :wink:

cool with me either way...

as for my soundset...this has to do with manuels soundset...i will not discuss mine here...

can wait to hear the demo on the Q....

hey manuel how long does it usually take u to finish a soundset now that u have been doin it awhile...

peace
Blank

My thread got hijacked.... :cry: