The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002

The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002 (http://www.infekted.org/virus/forum.php)
-   General discussion about music (http://www.infekted.org/virus/forumdisplay.php?f=115)
-   -   Time signatures and beat calculations (http://www.infekted.org/virus/showthread.php?t=24818)

Drammy 19.11.2004 12:28 PM

Time signatures and beat calculations
 
Right, I have some gaps in my musical knowledge and I am hoping someone can fill them for me...

With time signatures I know that 4/4 means there are 4 instances of a 1/4 note per measure.

So 5/8 would mean that there are 5 instances of an 1/8 note per measure.

My question is this - does that mean that with a 5/8 time signature there are 5 beats per measure?

So with a tempo of 100bpm and a time signature of 5/8, is the following maths correct:

300ms per 1/8 note (ie beat)

and 1.5s per measure

I think I have but would appreciate someone confirming this or if not then explaining it in simpleton terms.

Thanks,

Drammy

Juho L 19.11.2004 07:33 PM

Re: Time signatures and beat calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Drammy
So 5/8 would mean that there are 5 instances of an 1/8 note per measure.

Yes.

Quote:

My question is this - does that mean that with a 5/8 time signature there are 5 beats per measure?
Yes.

Quote:

So with a tempo of 100bpm and a time signature of 5/8, is the following maths correct:

300ms per 1/8 note (ie beat)

and 1.5s per measure
Yes.

Quote:

I think I have but would appreciate someone confirming this or if not then explaining it in simpleton terms.
Is "yes" a simpleton term enough?

jasedee 20.11.2004 05:53 AM

Re: Time signatures and beat calculations
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Juho L
Is "yes" a simpleton term enough?

Can you dumb it down just a tad? ;)

Drammy 20.11.2004 10:04 AM

Thanks Juho...

Drammy 31.03.2006 11:54 AM

Sorry to bring this post back up again, but I still can't get my head around something. Problem is I am not too sure what it is I cannot get my head around...

Lets take a track with a tempo of 120bpm.

If the signature is 4/4 then each beat lasts for 500 ms... (correct?)

Now what...?

How long would each beat last for if the signature is 6/8? Sorry to be a school teacher but you must show your workings...



Ta,
Drammy

jasedee 31.03.2006 11:59 AM

Im gonna take a wild guess and say that nothing has changed...

Only now, you have 6 8th notes per bar (cant remember technical term), but your tempo is still 120BPM, so each beat still is only 0.5s

Am I right???

EDIT: Geez... I was so wrong!!!! Maths was never my strong point, so why am I studying acoustics at uni? Crazy I tells ya....

Drammy 31.03.2006 01:12 PM

I don't know, thats the problem.

Or has the fact that the 4th has become an eigth - made the length of the beat half?

It is all so confusilating (I've been playing Ratchet and Clank 2).

Threlly 31.03.2006 01:40 PM

just use timings based on the smallest reasonable measure
125ms

so, 125ms, 250ms, 500ms, 375ms(250ms+125ms)

get tricky, 62.5ms+125ms=187.5

187.5ms+250ms=437.5ms

try em, mix em right channel 250ms, left channel 375ms, feedback 187.5ms

etc etc etc

There is a simple formula for BMP to Milliseconds, do a Google.

Tarekith 31.03.2006 01:58 PM

Divide 60000 by your tempo to find the ms of a 1/4 note.

IE: 60000/132 = 1/4 note that's 454.54ms long

To find an 1/8th note, just halve the answer, IE 227.27ms

Drammy 31.03.2006 05:32 PM

Yeah I get all this guys,

Thing is I am writing a delay calc for myself in Visual Studio and I am trying to work out how to calculate delays on different time signatures...

I have all the 1/1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 and so on notes worked out for normal notes, dotted notes and triplets, but I don't quite understnad the effect of a time signature on a beats length.

Although my investigations are leading me to believe that it doesn't matter...


Anyone for input?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org