View Single Post
  #24  
Old 06.10.2005, 09:28 PM
nutekk nutekk is offline
Almost Amateur
Almost Amateur
 
Join Date: 05.10.2005
Posts: 129
Default

yea im glad you can see what im saying.
ive switched to mixing 24/96 last year and havent looked back since.

the only problem with working at the high rate is that it
uses alot of cpu cycles.
so in order to compensate for this i want to get a few hardware synths
so i wont have to use so many vsti and take the load of of my pc.

so the virus ti got me very excited.its an audio interface
a control surface, a badass synth engin and a good looker too.

but to use it at a 24/96 rate i would have to use the analog outs!
problem is i have a pulsar soundcard with only 1 set of analog inputs.
the rest are didgital (16)

so some of the luster has worn thin...i cant just plug it up and intergrate it
without buying another sound card.

so using the analog outs...the usb just tranfers midi data
could have just used a midi cable for that~

to me this is a misrepresentation of what it was.
it is only "TI" when you are running @ 16/44
i dont think this is what they initially intended.
for sure if they continue with the "TI" line
the next one will be able to do the higher rate.

the benefits of mixing and recording at higher rates then 16/44
are easy to hear...no matter what the medium.
even if going to cd.
do some research and you will find it to be true.

dont kid yourself the future is higher rates then 16/44
Reply With Quote