General discussion about Access Virus Discussion about Virus A, B, C and TI. |

09.11.2004, 04:15 PM
|
 |
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Access Virus TI reduced aliasing?
On another forum someone said to me that aliasing in the TI model will be less audiable because its using 192khz dacs. Can someone confirm this?
Cheers
DS
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS
The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
|

09.11.2004, 04:26 PM
|
Complete Newbie
Complete Newbie
|
|
Join Date: 23.07.2002
Posts: 17
|
|
I dont think that has anything to do with aliasing, but I could be wrong.
I mean, that wouldn't explain why softsynth's alias.
|

09.11.2004, 05:07 PM
|
 |
Administrator
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 14.05.2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Higher resolution makes smoother "blending" possible. So I think it reduces aliasing.
|

09.11.2004, 06:50 PM
|
 |
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
|
|
This is the original post...
'So, the new Virus TI, which uses 192Khz DACs will have less 'audible' aliasing than the old Virus B/C, as the nyquest frequency is now 96Khz. so you need to pick waveforms with harmonics higher than 96khz to get aliasing. So if you go for a waveform with a 100Khz harmonic, you hear a 92Khz harmonic (or rather, don't hear it). But this does mean an increase in processing power (remember you have samples to fill and at 192Khz, a *LOT* more samples to fill)'
So Juho does that make sence to you?
DS
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS
The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
|

09.11.2004, 07:58 PM
|
 |
Administrator
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 14.05.2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DIGITAL SCREAMS
So Juho does that make sence to you?
|
Yup. As I said, more resolution -> Smoother blending -> higher frequencies.
|

09.11.2004, 09:33 PM
|
 |
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
|
|
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS
The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
|

10.11.2004, 07:52 AM
|
 |
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 11.12.2003
Location: Northern Beaches - Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,755
|
|
The thing is, depending on how steep the filters are to stop frequencies above the Nyquist, we get a phenomena where a "ripple-back" effect takes place, causing some 'distortions'.....
Aparently, 'they' are now saying you can go too far with sample rates, and we should stick to 96kHz!!!
Which is real bad for me, seeing as my site name is 192k24bit.com
If you use more gentle slope filters that cut gradually, this effect is minimised. So if we start the roll-off from 44.1k all the way to 96k, it will be better??? So, the question is:
"How good/gentle are the anti-aliasing filters on the Ti??"
__________________
MYSPACE
G5, Cubase SX, Reason 2.5, Acess Virus RackXL, Yamaha Motif Rack, Yamaha CS-10, Roland D-50, Korg X5D, Korg Electribe ER-1mkII, HALion VST Sampler, MOTU 2408mkIII, Studer 169, Roland JUNO 60
|

10.11.2004, 01:05 PM
|
New here
New here
|
|
Join Date: 24.05.2002
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 7
|
|
I'd be really surprised if the internal sample rate was upped to 192kHz. My guess is that the internal sample rate of the sound engine is the same as before, just that the converters can support 192kHz.
|

10.11.2004, 01:12 PM
|
 |
Administrator
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 14.05.2002
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 2,318
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by unease4u
I'd be really surprised if the internal sample rate was upped to 192kHz. My guess is that the internal sample rate of the sound engine is the same as before, just that the converters can support 192kHz.
|
And there's no sense in that. It would be waste. The internal processing has to also be 192kHz or the high resolution DA is useless because on lower sample rates than 192kHz it would just be idle on most time in form of transforming data that has already been transformed.
|

10.11.2004, 03:06 PM
|
New here
New here
|
|
Join Date: 24.05.2002
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 7
|
|
Well, I'd love to be proven wrong but running the audio engine at 192kHz would take 4 times the processing power compared to 48kHz.
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org
|