Total Integration Discussion

[feedingear]

I suggest reading the manual.

[///OSS]

I dont need too, I know the machine in an out, I just dont use VC enough.

[feedingear]

Fair enough - dont mean any offense. But you can send audio from OUT 1, 2 and 3 for your parts in the TI as the Virus plugin as three channels in your DAW - just set up the part output individually. For my purposes, I use the USB outs until I am ready to print, then I will send it via OUT 1 L+R as I feel it sounds richer.

Gorgeous studio btw.

[///OSS]

Originally Posted by feedingear

Fair enough - dont mean any offense. But you can send audio from OUT 1, 2 and 3 for your parts in the TI as the Virus plugin as three channels in your DAW - just set up the part output individually. For my purposes, I use the USB outs until I am ready to print, then I will send it via OUT 1 L+R as I feel it sounds richer.

Gorgeous studio btw.

Its cool appreciate that. and thanks!

Yeah I use the multi-outs on the board itself too but not the USB ones, Im just used to using it independently because when i used the USB outs thru the DAW I got that latency and the thinner sound but I never tried to actually use the Analog outs while I had VC on...WWWWOOOPPsss..lol

Sure would've saved me a few frustrating moments. Question is why would you use it any other way? You can setup the exact same scenario if the DAWs audio interface has 6 inputs and retain the realtime playability and still benefit from the DAWs automation and channel features by using direct monitor with only one pass thru the engine instead of 2 by routing via USB.


www.othersidesounds.com
www.pushmp.com

[feedingear]

I suppose the USB outs are useful for those who dont have the cash to own an audio interface with multi I/O (such as myself before I got rid of my little Tascam US144 and got a Motu Ultralite MK3), so it made the synth more marketable as Total Integration.

[///OSS]

Originally Posted by feedingear

I suppose the USB outs are useful for those who dont have the cash to own an audio interface with multi I/O (such as myself before I got rid of my little Tascam US144 and got a Motu Ultralite MK3), so it made the synth more marketable as Total Integration.

Most definitely, Yeah if it's your interface then that's just the best way.

I think the D/As on the TI are pretty great it's the A/D's that kinda suck.

But yeah the MOTU stuff took a nice step up on its MKIII gear, very happy with the 828. Id love to have an Ultralite for my laptop but I need to control myself lol Might pick up one of these for the lappy, hopefully the TI plays nice with it.

http://www.rolandus.com/products/pro...0&ParentId=114

[pwm]

I've got a TI and a C. I don't use TI mode. I found it more reliable to work with control lanes in my daw and sysex dumps.. I keep thinking I'll give TI another go. I just never get round to it yet I'm using the Viruses every working day. I do find it a drag that I can't see waveform displays or create arps and I have to hack sysex to edit the arps and other params but at least in feel in control and only dealing with the information I need.

[///OSS]

Originally Posted by pwm

I've got a TI and a C. I don't use TI mode. I found it more reliable to work with control lanes in my daw and sysex dumps.. I keep thinking I'll give TI another go. I just never get round to it yet I'm using the Viruses every working day. I do find it a drag that I can't see waveform displays or create arps and I have to hack sysex to edit the arps and other params but at least in feel in control and only dealing with the information I need.

definitely give it another whack cuz I have found a new way to do it from what Im used too and I'm very happy so far...editing the arps was always a plus but the VC was a drag but if you reroute things it gives you the same realtime response,, granted you have to have a low latency setup for Direct monitoring if not then you'll end up going back to your regular ways.