access at NAMM show

[grimleyj]

Originally Posted by The girl next door

What problems??????????????????????

Sarcasm right?

http://www.sunesha.nu/virusforum/viewtopic.php?t=4796

http://www.sunesha.nu/virusforum/viewtopic.php?t=4804

... and every other post on the Access mailing list.

[The girl next door]

Originally Posted by grimleyj

Sarcasm right?

No....... We are running it (Via USB) with Logic 5.5.1 with a Motu 828 MK2. when the latency is at its lowest on the soundcard there are NO problems................................................................

[F5D]

Originally Posted by The girl next door

No....... We are running it (Via USB) with Logic 5.5.1 with a Motu 828 MK2. when the latency is at its lowest on the soundcard there are NO problems................................................................

You're saying that you use 64 samples buffer (or was the 32 samples the lowest buffer size)? I wonder how much you have cpu left for other tasks. Usually things run smoother if you increase the buffer size and no other vst/au will run worse if you increase the buffer.

I run everything @ 512 samples buffer and many professional studios use the highest possible buffer size (1024 samples usually). It's just the computer- & gear tweakers who use the lowest possible buffer sizes. Finally they realize that there isn't much sense and use the 512 or 1024 anyway when their cpu is at 100%. I know many friends who have gone thru this. If the TI cannot work well with higher buffer settings then there's another bug. Maybe the timing problems cannot be heard when using so small buffer sizes. Just a guess, I haven't purchased the TI yet because people are reporting so many problems with it. And I bet that the rest who report that are running fine with the TI have to do some compromises or are not stressing their systems to the maximum.

[The girl next door]

Originally Posted by F5D

You're saying that you use 64 samples buffer (or was the 32 samples the lowest buffer size)? I wonder how much you have cpu left for other tasks. Usually things run smoother if you increase the buffer size and no other vst/au will run worse if you increase the buffer.

I run everything @ 512 samples buffer and many professional studios use the highest possible buffer size (1024 samples usually). It's just the computer- & gear tweakers who use the lowest possible buffer sizes. Finally they realize that there isn't much sense and use the 512 or 1024 anyway when their cpu is at 100%. I know many friends who have gone thru this. If the TI cannot work well with higher buffer settings then there's another bug. Maybe the timing problems cannot be heard when using so small buffer sizes. Just a guess, I haven't purchased the TI yet because people are reporting so many problems with it. And I bet that the rest who report that are running fine with the TI have to do some compromises or are not stressing their systems to the maximum.

We run mostly on 256 we also have alot running on our Powercore, also the virus Runs on its own DSPs as well (We only use our PC for music so nearly everything is switched off http://www.thegirlnextdoor.de/XPtuning.htm).we only have to put up our buffer samples to 512 when we open Z3t+a or Spectrasonics Plugs because with those plugs we get Asio dropouts at 256 or less.When we but it up to 512 then the Virus ti arpeggiator starts to Lose itself maybe once a day.
If it starts to piss us off we record one or more Parts from Z3t+a and Spectrasonics to Audio then knock the Motu 828 MK2 back down to 256,i must admit if we pump up the soundcard to 1024 the Virus starts going tits up.
But if i would do this(1024) J?rg our keyboard player would rip off my bollocks for the latency when hes playing,so we stick to around 256

[F5D]

Originally Posted by The girl next door

We run mostly on 256 we also have alot running on our Powercore, also the virus Runs on its own DSPs as well.

But if i would do this(1024) J?rg our keyboard player would rip off my bollocks for the latency when hes playing,so we stick to around 256

Ok, that sounds to be still a reasonable buffer.

[Hollowcell]

Originally Posted by The girl next door

What problems??????????????????????

Do you get that hardware boot-glitch that has been discussed?

[The girl next door]

Originally Posted by Hollowcell

Do you get that hardware boot-glitch that has been discussed?

No...Why what happens ??????

[The girl next door]

Originally Posted by The girl next door

No...Why what happens ??????

Yo...Just read about it on the trouble page....
Only ever had it once since i owned the Ti (2 months)
I always switch on the Ti before i fire up my PC(Don't know if that makes a difference ????Does it?) also switch on my Motu 828 and powercore before i start up my PC... we really don't have any issues with 1.07...But 1.08 is fucking toilet(For those of you that ain't from England toilet is Crap,shit,bollocks,pants)

[Hollowcell]

Originally Posted by Hollowcell

Do you get that hardware boot-glitch that has been discussed?

Actually I shouldn't have said "hardware" as it may be nothing at all to do with hardware - sorry bout that.

Still though, you really seem like one of the lucky ones there The Girl Next Door.

Anyhow...
Keeping on topic. Namm is around the corner and hopefully Access do have some new goodies. Let's just hope one is a new OS with the latest fixes for you TI owners.

[Timo]

Originally Posted by The girl next door

we really don't have any issues with 1.07...But 1.08 is fucking toilet(For those of you that ain't from England toilet is Crap,shit,bollocks,pants)

I think "we" have been away from England too long! I've never heard that expression, nor can I visualise anyone having the balls to say it. It sounds kinda, er, crap.