Access Virus & Virus TI community since 2002 Virus TI Infekted

Go Back   The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002 > Discussion concerning Access products > Trouble with your Access Virus?

Trouble with your Access Virus? Here you can get help when you have trouble or just don't know what to do.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25.05.2009, 12:12 PM
mkline mkline is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 20.03.2009
Posts: 8
Default Plug latency even when using analog output ???s

Don't get this one, I have all my outs set to analog out (1+2), and the plug is still reporting to the host 3968 samples delay ???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25.05.2009, 09:07 PM
7G 7G is offline
Infektion taking hold...
Newbie
 
Join Date: 10.12.2005
Posts: 50
Default

Specs please...
Audio Card,sequencer,buffer size???
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/yorgosarabatzis

Intel Core 2 Duo E6850@3GHz 2GB DD3 RAM
XP PRO SP3 w/2 150GB WD Raptors
Powerbook G4 1.5Ghz 2GB RAM OSX 10.4.11
Ableton Live 8
Serato SL1
VirusTI Desktop MK1
MOTU 828MKII
Genelec 8030
M-Audio UC-33 & MK-249C
Roland FC-300
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25.05.2009, 09:40 PM
mkline mkline is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 20.03.2009
Posts: 8
Default

Don't see what it has to do with my specs...
If the plug reports a delay (latency) the host will trigger the midi earlier (in this case about 90 msec) to compensate. As I'm not using the usb for audio, this delay is too big.
When using the analogs out, the plug shouldn't report any latency, at least not that much.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26.05.2009, 07:06 AM
Hell Yeh Hell Yeh is offline
Infektion taking hold...
Newbie
 
Join Date: 22.05.2007
Posts: 74
Default

The Virus|Control plug-in, itself, has an enormous amount of plug-in delay/latency. All DAW applications except for Pro Tools LE/M-Powered automatically compensate for this. However, plug-in delay is different from the latency you experience when recording through analog inputs. You will experience that no matter what unless your DAW or audio interface has some kind of direct monitoring feature that will allow you to hear the analog inputs without any latency. The best way to get around your problem is to reduce your hardware buffer to the lowest setting whenever you record or monitor your Virus' inputs.
__________________
Windows XP Home SP3 :: Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3R :: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 :: Corsair 4GB DDR2-800
Cubase 5 :: Live 7 :: Pro Tools M-Powered 8
M-Audio ProFire 2626 :: Virus TI Polar
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26.05.2009, 07:31 AM
mkline mkline is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 20.03.2009
Posts: 8
Default

Well I do monitor directly the analogs out (hardware mixer).

But as the virus plug shows such big delay to the host, this one will compensate and start to play the midi earlier, which is fine when using the audio from the plug thru usb, but is far too early when direct monitoring the analogs out.

I also tried to send the midi directly to the usb midi port or the standard midi port of the ti, but no luck, once the vst plug is used there is no other way to send the midi to the ti.

Anyway, for now I removed the plug as it's more trouble than fun (midi delay, clock out of sync, loud noises trying to destroy your ears, though this one may be related to the ti itself )
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26.05.2009, 08:55 AM
marc marc is offline
Veteran
Veteran
 
Join Date: 06.08.2003
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkline View Post
Well I do monitor directly the analogs out (hardware mixer).

But as the virus plug shows such big delay to the host, this one will compensate and start to play the midi earlier, which is fine when using the audio from the plug thru usb, but is far too early when direct monitoring the analogs out.

I also tried to send the midi directly to the usb midi port or the standard midi port of the ti, but no luck, once the vst plug is used there is no other way to send the midi to the ti.

Anyway, for now I removed the plug as it's more trouble than fun (midi delay, clock out of sync, loud noises trying to destroy your ears, though this one may be related to the ti itself )
the analog outs were never in time when using total integration. this has been discussed here and elsewhere many times. the delay has nothing to do with the latency compensation settings of the plug-in and cannot be overcome unless the sequencer provides a certain information. we are working with pretty much all sequencer manufacturers to improve this.

marc
access music
__________________
*** This is not an official forum, in order to get a guaranteed response from Access Music contact support here: http://www.virus.info/?go=contact ***

Follow the Virus on Twitter: http://twitter.com/accessmusic
Watch the Virus on Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/accessmusic
Become Infected friends on Facebook: http://facebook.com/pages/Virus/77569453701
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26.05.2009, 09:49 AM
mkline mkline is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 20.03.2009
Posts: 8
Default

Then why not let the user be able to set the delay reported to the host.

I could compensate by setting a delay on the track itself (most host let's you do that). But it would be easier to do it on the plug itself.

Currently my routing is ti analog outs to mixer (audio doesn't go thru the host).
But if I want to record the analogs outs of the ti, the latency won't be the same anymore, as this time it goes thru my audio card, so I would have to re-adjust each track again.
By letting the user set the delay reported to the host, this would require a single setting change (on the plug).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26.05.2009, 10:38 AM
marc marc is offline
Veteran
Veteran
 
Join Date: 06.08.2003
Posts: 671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkline View Post
Then why not let the user be able to set the delay reported to the host.

I could compensate by setting a delay on the track itself (most host let's you do that). But it would be easier to do it on the plug itself.

Currently my routing is ti analog outs to mixer (audio doesn't go thru the host).
But if I want to record the analogs outs of the ti, the latency won't be the same anymore, as this time it goes thru my audio card, so I would have to re-adjust each track again.
By letting the user set the delay reported to the host, this would require a single setting change (on the plug).
it is not that easy. the latency reported to the host has nothing to do with the problem. if there would be an easy solution to all that which doesn't require work on the hosts as well, we would have made use of it.

best, marc
__________________
*** This is not an official forum, in order to get a guaranteed response from Access Music contact support here: http://www.virus.info/?go=contact ***

Follow the Virus on Twitter: http://twitter.com/accessmusic
Watch the Virus on Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/accessmusic
Become Infected friends on Facebook: http://facebook.com/pages/Virus/77569453701
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26.05.2009, 12:36 PM
mkline mkline is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 20.03.2009
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marc View Post
[..]the latency reported to the host has nothing to do with the problem[..]
Hmm, then how do you explain this:

This is the audio received from the ti analog outs thru my rme 96/32 (using 128 buffer sample + the 32 "safety" buffer).

The first track doesn't use live mode, the ti reports about 3000 samples delay to the host (C4). (note that we have much less than 3000 samples, could be due to a cubase limit ??).
In the second track, Live mode is this time enabled and the ti plug reports 512 samples to the host.
For the third track I removed the plug and sended the midi directly to the ti driver.

In this case, when using the plug, it would be nice to set manualy the delay to report to the host, no need to set up each track.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26.05.2009, 01:33 PM
marc marc is offline
Veteran
Veteran
 
Join Date: 06.08.2003
Posts: 671
Default

mike,

i appreciate your effort in showing us how things look in terms of latency. i know that all - since years. if there would be an obvious and easy solution, you might imagine that we would have implemented it by now. unfortunately, to explain to you in deep why your idea doesn't work, would require me to give away intellectual property which we prefer to stay with access only.

best, marc
__________________
*** This is not an official forum, in order to get a guaranteed response from Access Music contact support here: http://www.virus.info/?go=contact ***

Follow the Virus on Twitter: http://twitter.com/accessmusic
Watch the Virus on Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/accessmusic
Become Infected friends on Facebook: http://facebook.com/pages/Virus/77569453701
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org