Semi Pro studio set up (what equipment do you need?)

[DIGITAL SCREAMS]

Hehe amusing responses guys....

But my idea for this thread....was to get an idea of what people use for outboard. Compressors, limiters, exciters, channel strips etc etc. Can someone add to that?

DS

[MonkeyMan]

God damn - No ones shaving my monkey ass!

How long is a piece of string!!!

Be a bit more specific mate. What is your estimated total budget and also what music are you aiming to produce?

If it is solely electronic based music then we can perhaps bypass a whole load of gear and concentrate on getting decent A/D D/A conversion into your DAW. This is something I can give advice on.

On the other hand if you are going down the more tradtional band, guitar and vocal route then I am certain someone will be able to assist you in this area.

Let me know either way - just off to swing around a few lamp posts.

[Analog Warriors]

Originally Posted by DIGITAL SCREAMS

Hehe amusing responses guys....

But my idea for this thread....was to get an idea of what people use for outboard. Compressors, limiters, exciters, channel strips etc etc. Can someone add to that?

compressor and limiter - some nice effects and a mastering eq

[Khazul]

The only post production type outboard I use is a couple of Behringer units that I use only for quick and dirty mastering type processing when monitoring record and prior to doing post production work. Its really just to get an idea what the 'produced' version will sound like.

Those units are:

DEQ2496 - its a graphic eq, dynamic eq, parametric eq, compressor/expander+limiter and stereo imager

DSP1424P - An enhancer/maximiser

Between the two of them I can very quickly get a rough idea what the produced version will sound like. The DEQ2496 is however an essential bit of kit for post production as well, but only as a metring uinit as it has a very good RTA (spectrum analyser) and various meter modes.

I dont use either in the audio path for post production currently (I used to), but maybe I will start using them again as I get better results with them than the junk that comes with Cubase SX 3 - I might have a look at the Waves plugin in the future.

[jasedee]

The thing is DS, "Decent" sounding tracks can be made on even the most basic setups.

Mike Skinner (The Streets) had a very basic setup for the first album, and I reckon it is great. Very raw.

I have some albums done on a 4 track casette that are great. Real lo-fi, but gorgeous sounding.

It is a very general question. But really, the more you spend, the better the quality. If you use a Neumann mic over a behringer one you will hear the difference. If you buy a Distressor over a focusrite you will hear the difference. Good quality audio design is expensive.

Also, it very much depends on whos driving. Know what I mean???

[Khazul]

Originally Posted by jasedee

Also, it very much depends on whos driving. Know what I mean???

Absolutely - knowing the gear you are using I think is way more important than what gear you have so long as it is upto the kind of processing you want ot apply. That goes hand in hand of course with having someone experience enough to cope with the material they are given and recognise and solve potential problems in it - that just takes time - for that reason I will spend time on post production for trash that im never going to release - just useful training

[Timo]

A liberal application of distortion/overdrive processing is nice. Even on stuff like piano (as is compression). And valves/tubes (inc. emulation) are always useful, especially on mid-range stuff like pads and various types of drums, etc..

Also guitar style 'stomp box' type effects (inc. emulation) are your (well, at least my) friend(s).

[~+?]

Originally Posted by grs

A lava lamp, and one of those new ergonomic 'office chairs'.

You forgot the Bonsai tree

[Wandering Kid]

a chair DS! you need the most god damn comfortable chair ever made because you simply cannot produce for hours on end with a sore arse and a shooting pain up your hunched back!