Mopho or Blofeld ?

[namnibor]

Originally Posted by Rick Boogie

As discussed in another thread, you and I have very similar set-ups, and more. I had a MoPho kb, but sold it to a bandmate, and replaced it with an MEK, which is beyond awesome a mono synth. Also have a Little Phatty, (my 2nd- sold the 1st one), a Blofeld kb which I also love to death, and a Virus KB. Of the 4 currently, the Blofeld is my most used polysynth, and an absolute joy to dig in and synthesize- the mod matrix is so intelligently laid out, it's a breeze going through each of the 16 modulation slots- and the sound can be anything from lush and sparkly, all the way to crude and vicious. The Phatty does basses and solo's, and sounds, well, like a Moog. MEK can do all that, plus crazy stuff, especially with the sequencer. Sometimes it runs wild while I'm playing something else on another synth. Then, there's my Virus KB, which I love, but if one had to go, this would be the one. Great as it is, between it and Mr Blo, well, what I said about tweaking the Waldorf is true, and Virus is much more challenging. May have to keep all 4, but my music room is crowded with basses/guitars/ amps/pedalboards- I need room. Anyway, that's my 2 cents.

Just remember when space is an issue, MIDI is indeed your best beast of a friend!!! Also, do not negate the fact the KB could be resting outside the stands and used to process audio through her let alone whilst using midi thru to pass signals through your chain when you want.
Yes, the MEK is quite awesome and I have now two desktop evolvers polychained to it and of course the extra audio outs required meant adding another one space 16 channel mixer but oh, the sound!! "I see (and hear) stars!!!"
Agree with you the Virus KB and KC is a bit more challenging but I actually like that because it forces me to see outside the box of possibilities and I know will be learning every day something new and through repetition, will become able to then go even further down the rabbit hole. The Virus has lots of knobs BUT all the menus diving could easily been mostly eliminated if they had utilized even part of the 75% of unused real estate on top of at least the keyboard version. I can see where the design is such that the desktop Virus is laid out exactly same but most of use knob-twiddlers would have paid more for more immediately accessed parameters with dedicated knobs or MORE knobs utilizing the "shift button" for those areas. I am certainly not complaining, just mumbling about.
I have an Alesis Fusion that is going to have to go to someone that can use it as I have my **last** rack gear on way, just scored a yellow Waldorf Q Rack and justified it as another Christmas present from my wacko cat
On the MEK, I have been talking to someone at DSI about some things and speaking of MIDI, when and if you ever get a desktop evolver and polychain it to MEK, the MIDI OUT of the MEK can still drive say, a mono instrument like your Moog. Also, when not using the polychain out, it acts as a second MIDI OUT Learned that it's actually advantagious to have our MEK over the Poly Evolver in that it's more capable when polychained than the PEK because in the PEK, for EACH voice used in a "combo", you lose a voice! With the MEK a person can add up to 20 evolver desktops/voices, and not lose polyphony. The sound is massive even with one polychained and with three...let's just say it's quite enough and the analog side of evolver IMO sounds more fat that the Mopho or Prophet 08.
The aftertouch expressiveness on MEK modulation routings is simply amazing....okay, I will stop!