Was 9/11 an inside job?

[XLR8A]

[XLR8A]

Paranoia is an excessive anxiety or fear concerning one's own well-being which is considered irrational and excessive, perhaps to the point of being a psychosis. This includes persecutory beliefs concerning a likely threat, or a belief in a conspiracy theory. In the original Greek, παράνοια (paranoia) means simply madness (para = outside; nous = mind) and it is this use which was traditionally used in psychiatry to describe any delusional state.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia

Schizophrenia (from the Greek word σχιζοφρένεια, or shjzofre'neja, meaning "split mind") is a psychiatric diagnosis that describes a mental disorder characterized by impairments in the perception or expression of reality and by significant social or occupational dysfunction. A person experiencing schizophrenia is typically characterized as demonstrating disorganized thinking, and as experiencing delusions or hallucinations, in particular auditory hallucinations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia

A conspiracy theory attempts to attribute the ultimate cause of an event or chain of events (usually political, social, or historical events), or the concealment of such causes from public knowledge, to a secret, and often deceptive, plot by a covert alliance of powerful or influential people or organizations. Many conspiracy theories claim that major events in history have been dominated by conspirators who manipulate political happenings from behind the scenes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspir...iracy_theories

[nvisibl]

Maybe its you who believes in the conspiracy theory. i.e. the Official story




For anone who is interested, I find this to be one of the better info-mentaries on the blatent 9/11 cover-up.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...99104255077250


XLR8, what's your views on this following clip where BBC reports the WTC7 collapse 20+ minutes before it actually occurs?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096

[XLR8A]

Originally Posted by nvisibl

XLR8, what's your views on this following clip where BBC reports the WTC7 collapse 20+ minutes before it actually occurs?

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096

1) How is the time established? On the video there is no clock and no announcement of the hour. (Not when they go through the top-of-the-hour routine). Please go through the process by which one obtains this video, step by step, and establishes the time.

2) Assuming it's 10 pm as you say. What gives you the impression it was BST (British Summer Time)?
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/...nes/eu/bst.html

This is BBC World Service, not a national British feed. They are broadcast by satellite on a global scale and would never use BST but GMT (Greenwich Mean Time), also known as UTC (Universal Time, Coordinated).
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/...nes/eu/bst.html

GMT/UTC never jumps for anyone's national idea of daylight savings time. Thus the time used by local clocks in Greenwich on 9/11/2001 would be BST or UTC+1.

New York on 9/11/2001 was on EDT (Eastern Daylight Time), not EST (Eastern Standard Time), as you indicate on the title you added. EDT is UTC -4.
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/...nes/na/edt.html

WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20 pm EDT. 10 pm GMT is 6 pm EDT.

That would mean that in the clip you have chosen, the BBC anchor is conveying the information about the collapse of the Salomon Brotheres Building (a.k.a. WTC 7) at 5:57 pm EDT or approximately 37 minutes after the event.

3)But that still doesn't explain how she is telling you that building number 7 has come down when she is stood infront of it right?
Well, the answer is so obvious: the animated arrow isn't even pointing at the building number 7 because it has been already collapsed.

4)Doesn't BBC news usually have a time stamp on screen? Why on this video it's been removed by the editor, what's the reason for doing this?

5)http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse....i?u=911_morons Any questions?

[nvisibl]

If before shooting off with your ignorance and arrogance you had gone to the source link shown at the begining of this smaller clip you would see that the full file is available there, and on downloading and watching this file you would see further the EST timestamp.

Also, if you had done a simple google search you would see that BBC has already made a statement on this clip, and amongst some lame excuses claim that they have lost all their 9/11 footage. Well fancy that eh?

btw - Your Jihadist website is owned by a Canadian with a Paypal account

[XLR8A]

Originally Posted by nvisibl

If before shooting off with your ignorance and arrogance ...
btw - Your Jihadist website is owned by a Canadian with a Paypal account

Originally Posted by nvisibl

Bye bye, and Happy Jihad!
http://www.joe-ks.com/archives_oct2001/Jihad.jpg

Lol, look at yourself before you speak about ignorance and arrogance.

[ledge]

Oh another reason I can't believe it was an inside job.

If the (now multiple) governments involved were so clever to organise this whole thing without anyone catching them out beforehand why were they so stupid to have it pinned on al queda rather than Iraq and Saddam Hussein seeing as that is where they ultimately wanted to invade.

That just doesn't make any sense whatsoever.

[nvisibl]

Originally Posted by ledge

why were they so stupid to have it pinned on al queda rather than Iraq and Saddam Hussein seeing as that is where they ultimately wanted to invade.

May have been because Al-Queda is CIA funded? and Afghanistan is an easy target with easy access to Oil and Opium fields? 2 Big money spinners.

Al Queda & CIA funding - http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...ding&spell= 1


New Afghanistan Oil pipepline - http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...line&sp ell=1

CIA drug trafficking in Afghanistan - http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...afficking&meta=


Afghanistan also provides a very good strategic toe hold in the middle East.

Its not really so stupid when looked at in terms of gaining financial and military advantages in this apparently ongoing conquest. Iraq like Afghanistan is only another step along the way.

Careful not to dimiss anything without first doing some proper research.

[XLR8A]

Originally Posted by nvisibl

A 5 year old could tear the official 9/11 story to shreds ~ David Icke

At least for once i totally agree with the one and the only - David Icke! A 5 year old could tear anything to shreds. People older than a 5 year old imbecile may have more developed brains, and they usually tend to use it instead of just tearing everything up to shreds. While watching the conspiracy videos on youtube people may start thinking about stuff like: "What happened to the plane that (by the official version) crashed into the Pentagon, where is it now?" and "Where's all the passengers gone, what about their families and friends, what they have to say about it?" A 5 year old imbecile may think: "The pentagon hole looks too small on the internet, maybe the plane was a small rocket plane?" and "Maybe the passengers were trained secret CIA agents, they're all alive and working for the next government's 'terror' plot?" Etc...

[nvisibl]

Sorry XLR8, any credability you had was lost in this thread a few posts back